Shared Responsibility Global Issue

Question: Discuss about theShared Responsibilityfor Global Issue. Answer: Introduction A Global Issue where Shared Responsibility for the Common Good is not Being Realised: In philosophy, economics and in political science the term common good is referred to as the art of sharing for the benefit of the community, which is attained through citizenship, combined action and active contribution in the territory of politics and public service (Kruse Schmitt, 2015). Humans face the choice of accepting the modest sacrifices for a common good where they uncaringly defend themselves. Several appeals to common good have surfaced in the negotiations of trade and social accountabilities concerning the environmental pollution, inadequate education and problems related to poverty. The notion of common good is not in conformity with a pluralistic community. Different individuals have different ideas and these differences have expanded over the years. Even if the humans agreed upon their values they would certainly disagree concerning their value things which they share in common (Hemphill et al., 2016). One of the problems that came across is the effort to encourage common good with that of individualism. The historical customs have placed a greater value on the freedom, private rights which permit every human being to do their own things. According to the cultural views, society is understood as separate independent individuals who freely follow their goals and interest without any intervention from others. Under the individual civilization, it is hard and unfeasible to induce individuals to sacrifice few of their freedom along with their individual goals and interest for the sake of common goals (Shih Susanto, 2016). Appeals to common good are usually dealt with the problems of uneven sharing of responsibilities. Upholding common good generally requires an individual to shoulder the cost, which is much higher than those borne by others. These problems are generally considered as obstacle where the shared responsibility for common goods is not realised. Ways to Address the Challenge: To establish and sustain inclusive society it is critical that all members of the community should be motivated to contribute in civic, social, economical and political activities both at the global and domestic level. In order to address this challenge of promoting common good there are several areas which needs to be addressed. Firstly, to support the dignity of humanity, one must ask the questions relating to decision makers along with the treatment mated out to the humans since they are not commodities (Leipziger, 2015). Questions also arise relating to the procedure of making the existing supply chain into value chains. There are few goals, which need to be pursued. This consists of making the education system open to all, which brings equal opportunity for humans. In the wake of industrialisation, the goal must be of providing sufficient number of jobs. This demands large number of emphasis on creating employment opportunities for non-graduates with strong educational opportunities, apprentice schemes, a pro-active tax and incentive structure. Contributing in society requires commitment to reduce disparity and keeping earnings and rewards contained by fair bands at the pinnacle and underside of scale (Barna, 2013). Underpinning the realism of both opportunity and communal mobility helps in promoting human well being along with the liberty of equality to live a respected life. Corporations, governments and institution of all kinds are provided with charter carrying the hope that they will look for the common good. Complying on the basic universal and ethical values helps in restoring the common good. It is noteworthy to denote that complying with the needs for these values must be reflected in the legislation that is adopted and regulations propagated by the individual countries (Susskind Ali, 2014). This helps in defining international economic agreement which helps in identifies the duties of nations towards each other. Addressing the common good requires shifting from the shareholder model of organisations and client model of other important institutions such as universities school towards the stakeholder model. Financial sector, which is generally perceived as stable, socially useful and accountable, must strengthen the reality of both opportunity and communal mobility. An ethic steward cares for both the planet as well as posterity in contrast to the short-term market fundamentalism. Promoting an effective stewardship helps in determining the success by creating an impactful decision making policy. It is worth mentioning that promoting stewardship helps in encouraging commitment towards preserving natural capital in favour of the future generations. Converting an economy towards the endless growth will lead to sustainability of economy. Stewardship helps in adopting new and improved measurement systems, which helps in ascertaining the progress both at the global and organisational levels (Font et al., 2016). It is noteworthy to denote that a community where most members if not all feel that they are participating towards contributing the basic needs are provided with the opportunity to contribute in the process of decision making. Prevailing circumstances of strong civil society is fundamental in framing of public policies. It helps in fostering respect for the rights along with dignity for all people by assuming that the responsibilities are fulfilled within the society. In simple terms, humans must understand that sympathy, compassion and affinity forms the key to human being society. Humans cannot understand their own interest if not they understand the interest of others. Global systems creates more impact on the life of humans which calls for taking seriously the rights and responsibilities as others must be evolving as well. In the current the human race, it is evident that global systems have led to several global stage problems, which requires global level of answers (Boisson Nollkaemper, 2016). Global problems require global solutions and creating new institutions may be considered as useful in certain circumstances. Traditional civics provides the opportunity to decide the rights and responsibilities generated from the social contract within the state or nation. It should be noted that global issues demands harmonized actions at the global, domestic and provincial level. Thus, supplementary actions are necessary for several actors who are n ot the parties to the global conformities and whose responsibilities are not completely specified (Tarullo et al., 2015). It is worth mentioning that point of global ethics is not which the administration of the global issues must constantly be pushed forward to the global mechanisms. Hence, it is rather identifying the correct balance amid the global and local responsibilities for attaining the global ethics. Equal distribution of wealth and resources is another significant element of common good in an inclusive society. The allocation of resources and utilization significantly creates an impact on the orientation of society either in the direction of more integrated or disintegrated one. Hence, social economic policies must be so formed that helps in managing equal distribution and opportunities of resources. Inclusive policies and programs, which is sensitive to and cater less advantage, should be put into the place in all the areas and sections for sufficient implementations (Hemphill et al., 2016). Providing the options of diversity helps in checking and balancing the development of community as it allows the greatest amount of diverse opinions to enter every discourse. Thus, it can be concluded that society, which maintains the harmony of intention or collective vision embraced by community, will be termed as more complete since all members will working towards combined objective. Reference List: Barna, G. (2013).The power of team leadership: Achieving success through shared responsibility. WaterBrook. Boisson de Chazournes, L., Nollkaemper, A. (2016). Partnerships between International Institutions and Issues of (Shared) Responsibility.International Organizations Law Review,13(1), 1-20. Font, X., Guix, M., Bonilla-Priego, M. J. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in cruising: Using materiality analysis to create shared value.Tourism Management,53, 175-186. Hemphill, T. A., Hemphill, T. A., Kelley, K. J., Kelley, K. J. (2016). Socially responsible global supply chains: The human rights promise of shared responsibility and ISO 45001.Journal of Global Responsibility,7(2), 163-180. Kruse, A., Schmitt, E. (2015). Shared responsibility and civic engagement in very old age.Research in Human Development,12(1-2), 133-148. Leipziger, D. (2015).The corporate responsibility code book. Greenleaf Publishing. O'Faircheallaigh, C. (2013). Community development agreements in the mining industry: an emerging global phenomenon.Community Development,44(2), 222-238. Shih, H. A., Susanto, E. (2016). Perceived identifiability, shared responsibility and innovative work behavior.The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-19. Susskind, L. E., Ali, S. H. (2014).Environmental diplomacy: negotiating more effective global agreements. Oxford University Press. Tarullo, D. K., Hoenig, T. M., Walter, I., Goldberg, L. S., Huertas, T. F., Hughes, J. P., Mester, L. J. (2015). Shared responsibility for the regulation of international banks.